tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post705772033298668805..comments2023-09-22T13:15:42.060+02:00Comments on Modern Workplace - From my point of view: Lync in coexistence with CUCM part 4 (what a mess my lab is...?)Lasse Nordvik Wedøhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10761329326427656685noreply@blogger.comBlogger18125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-63298416844247926202013-02-11T20:44:30.448+01:002013-02-11T20:44:30.448+01:00Thanks Lasse!
Globalizing number to E.164 when c...Thanks Lasse! <br /><br />Globalizing number to E.164 when crossing CUCM "barrier" would be ideal, but the problem is that in RCC scenario that "barrier" is CUPS and I couldn't find anything in CUPS which would normalize number to E.164. <br /><br />I've tried dial plan normalization rules on Lync, but they didn't work and my understanding is that they only apply Sergeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18115077838106562406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-68786179851570775652013-02-11T08:54:38.628+01:002013-02-11T08:54:38.628+01:00Hi Sergey,
I believe I did. As far as I understand...Hi Sergey,<br />I believe I did. As far as I understand, the address book normalization only applies to the generation of the address book itself, not live normalization of incoming numbers.<br />My solution to this, is to have both systems use the fully E.164 format. Not by having CUCM endpoints have the E.164 number, but rather fully normalize and globalize the numbers when crossing the CUCM &Lasse Nordvik Wedøhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761329326427656685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-81745371567019442202013-02-09T00:17:43.677+01:002013-02-09T00:17:43.677+01:00Hi Lasse,
In your lab testing or at customer, di...Hi Lasse, <br /><br />In your lab testing or at customer, did you have an issue with Calling name mapping to the user for the incoming call when DNs in CUCM are NOT in E164 format? <br /><br />My CUCM extensions are 4 digits - say 1001, the telephone number attribute in Active Directory for the user is provisioned with full E164 number for that extension - say +16178631001. I have configured Sergeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18115077838106562406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-69180769674286439612012-10-22T21:23:05.924+02:002012-10-22T21:23:05.924+02:00Best Practice is to disable A/V when using RCC. So...Best Practice is to disable A/V when using RCC. So a video call from Lync to that user would fail. A video call from Cisco to that user would work, but not through Lync. You would nedd Cisco Software to handle the video call as well as the audio.<br /><br />Video between Cisco and Lync (When enabled), should be done through a VCS or similar device.Lasse Nordvik Wedøhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761329326427656685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-9320516852585913332012-10-22T18:30:57.781+02:002012-10-22T18:30:57.781+02:00Have you tried video call with Lync client when RC...Have you tried video call with Lync client when RCC is enabled? Is it possible?<br /><br />Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-53886328431041866702012-05-21T09:41:56.615+02:002012-05-21T09:41:56.615+02:00Good Morning,
Thank you for your answer, it's...Good Morning,<br /><br />Thank you for your answer, it's clearer now. <br />Finally I think that it's not a really good idea and investment trying to implement an integration of Lync solution and cisco Unified Communication.<br /><br />This blog really helps me in my research and I'm sure it will do it for others for a long time.<br /><br />Have a nice dayBrokenSword4noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-71805455447366744992012-05-19T21:39:01.750+02:002012-05-19T21:39:01.750+02:00Hi Again,
RCC stands for remote call control. With...Hi Again,<br />RCC stands for remote call control. With this, you will control your Cisco device with Lync. Signalling to the Cisco device will also signal the Lync client. <br /><br />But clicking "answer" on the Lync client will make the Cisco device go off hook. There will be no audio in Lync with RCC. <br /><br />When calling from Lync, if you choose option 2, the end user must makeLasse Nordvik Wedøhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761329326427656685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-18958899501560601982012-05-14T15:46:45.961+02:002012-05-14T15:46:45.961+02:00Good afternoon,
Thank you for this answer.
I thin...Good afternoon,<br />Thank you for this answer.<br /><br />I think that the 2) option would be the best. <br />This integration will be in an IT compagny, so users can easily understand I think.<br /><br />"But when answering that call, it will be the Cisco phone which is answering, and not the Lync client."<br />I don't understand that, because you said a the beginning of the topicbrokensword4noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-59583709723220351792012-05-14T15:45:37.198+02:002012-05-14T15:45:37.198+02:00Good afternoon,
Thank you for this answer.
I thin...Good afternoon,<br />Thank you for this answer.<br /><br />I think that the 2) option would be the best. <br />This integration will be in an IT compagny, so users can easily understand I think.<br /><br />"But when answering that call, it will be the Cisco phone which is answering, and not the Lync client."<br />I don't understand that, because you said a the beginning of the topicBrokenSword4noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-75329816343663500592012-05-13T12:35:13.351+02:002012-05-13T12:35:13.351+02:00Hi BrokenSword4,
When using RCC, you have two opt...Hi BrokenSword4,<br /><br />When using RCC, you have two options.<br />1) You turn off AV in Lync completely, to spare users of the confusion of where to pick up the call.<br />With RCC turned off, all the AV is kept within the CUCM environment. When you answer the call in Lync, it is the Cisco phone which goes off hook.<br /><br />2) You leave AV in Lync enabled. Then the users can make both Lasse Nordvik Wedøhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761329326427656685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-10350902184946946012012-05-11T11:12:27.342+02:002012-05-11T11:12:27.342+02:00Good morning,
I'm a french studient trying t...Good morning, <br /><br />I'm a french studient trying to list : what are the best ways to implement Lync Server and CUCM ? And at the end if the integration is interesting for my enterprise without changing everythin because they have CUCM and CUPS and CUPC.<br /><br />So after a month of research I found one thing that would be the best. <br />The integration with Cisco Unified Presence BrokenSword4noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-41833789224436770472012-02-26T12:16:09.556+01:002012-02-26T12:16:09.556+01:00Hi,
I would urge you to change the address scheme...Hi,<br /><br />I would urge you to change the address scheme to one without overlap. It's just that more easy to maintain in the long run.<br /><br />A VPN tunnell of some sort would seem like the appropriate way to solve some of your issues. And is necessary if you want to accomplish a direct SIP trunk calling scenario.<br /><br />You might keep in mind how to handle possible media bypass (Lasse Nordvik Wedøhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761329326427656685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-83710953583281143322012-01-18T01:44:44.826+01:002012-01-18T01:44:44.826+01:00This is very helpful. I'm up against a similar...This is very helpful. I'm up against a similar challenge. I'm the Manager of Network Engineering for a very large distribution network company. We made an acquisition of another company and the scenario is as follows.<br /><br />Voice<br />My Company: Cisco CUCM 8.6<br />Bought Company: Microsoft Lync 2010<br /><br />IM(Presence)<br />My Company: Microsoft OCS 2005<br />Bought Company: Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-73378800810081939602011-09-16T17:39:12.450+02:002011-09-16T17:39:12.450+02:00Hi Niclas,
A good question. There is no service p...Hi Niclas,<br /><br />A good question. There is no service panel og control applet to verify all of this in. The best indication is done by logging into Lync, and try to make a call. Or, call the user configured with rcc. It should signal the Lync client right away.Lasse Nordvik Wedøhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761329326427656685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-81423921467956760062011-09-16T14:10:28.777+02:002011-09-16T14:10:28.777+02:00How can you check that both lync and cisco callman...How can you check that both lync and cisco callmanager are connected to each otherNiclas Strømhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09814731005194305645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-20389184298348512532011-09-16T14:08:28.528+02:002011-09-16T14:08:28.528+02:00how can you confirm that you have access both way ...how can you confirm that you have access both way from the cups and lync?Niclas Strømhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09814731005194305645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-57714093677059899732011-07-19T07:26:30.933+02:002011-07-19T07:26:30.933+02:00That I haven't tested, but as far as I know, t...That I haven't tested, but as far as I know, the Lync doesn't really know what device it is controlling, so it should be possible.Lasse Nordvik Wedøhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761329326427656685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239456392253205397.post-72263809223569885102011-07-19T00:12:28.171+02:002011-07-19T00:12:28.171+02:00Would it be possible to setup RCC and have a soft ...Would it be possible to setup RCC and have a soft phone too?Amirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17411973286503999150noreply@blogger.com